Farming with Food Safety and Conservation in Mind
Relative
Risk of Animals in Produce Fields
Safe and Sustainable:
Co-managing for Ecological Health in California's Central Coast Region
WFA Food Safety Paper "Food
Safety Requires a Healthy Environment: Policy Recommendations for E.
coli O157"
Food Safety vs. Environment: Actual
or Perceived Conflict?
E. coli O157: A Biography
Animals and Food Safety
Vegetation as Pathogen Filter
"Politics
of the Plate: Greens of Wrath" in Gourmet Magazine
"Wildlife in
Middle of War on E. coli" from the
Wall Street Journal
"Fields
of Overkill" in High Country News
"California
Farmers Use Guns, Poison to Protect Crops" in the LA Times
"Minimizing Wildlife"
from the American Vegetable Grower
"How
Safe is your Salad?" in the San Francisco Chronicle
"GAP Metrics a Work in Progress"
in California Farmer
Addendum to WFA's Food Safety Paper "Environmental
Destruction in the Salinas Valley: 'Food Safety' Requirements to Remove
Habitat Make Leafy Greens Less Safe"
"Food
Safety and Environmental Quality Impose Conflicting Demands on Central
Coast Growers" in California Agriculture
Photos of Habitat Destruction
Antibiotic
Resistance
Slaughterhouses
Re-thinking
Harvest Machine Protocol
Packaging: Is
Bagged Salad a High Risk Product?
Irradiation
Conservation Concerns
Regarding a Proposed National Leafy Green Marketing Agreement
(LGMA)
The establishment of a nationwide LGMA
by the USDA similar to those currently implemented in California
and Arizona would bring about negative environmental consequences
including the degradation of soil, water and wildlife habitat
wherever leafy greens are grown. Until specific areas in the
agreement are clarified, the scope is narrowed to processed
greens, and a ceiling is placed on "supermetrics"
that go beyond the requirements of the LGMA, this agreement
should not go national.
Read
more
|