Biodiversity Conservation a Cornerstone of Organic Agriculture

Biodiversity conservation was initially ignored in the National Organic Program (NOP) regulations when they were first published back in 2002. We've changed that.



As part of our work to eliminate the incentive to convert unplowed Native Ecosystems to organic crop production, we encouraged the NOSB to publish a Discussion Document on this subject for their April meeting. Over 450 public comments weighed in on this issue, with WFA in the lead. Click Here to Learn More.

To help the National Organic Standards Board and others in the organic community better understand how the different parts of the HCVA definition would be applied, we published this pictograph: High Conservation Value Areas (HCVA): Scenarios for Disincentivizing Conversion, Incentives for Protection, and Using Non-HCVA Immediately.

In September, the NOSB released a proposed rule change and WFA submitted comments on how to improve the language. More than 350 public comments weighed in on the proposed rule. Click Here to Learn More. 

Along with our comments, we released an Issue Brief about this issue and how to take action. Click here to download the Issue Brief. 

We completed an assessment of the majority of US based certifiers' Organic System Plans (OSP) and published a report on how the OSPs are addressing biodiversity along with several recommendations on how to move forward. Click Here to Learn More.

Click here to download the OSP report.

Other accomplishments include:

  • We helped 14 organic US-based certifiers, representing more than 14,000 organic farmers (over half of the organic farmers in the country) to update their Organic System Plans (OSPs). 
  • We conducted 5 organic inspector trainings on biodiversity guidance.
  • Empowered more than 815 people to encourage the NOSB to protect native ecosystems.


The NOP publishes the Guidance!

Click here to to read the final NOP Natural Resources and Biodiversity Conservation Guidance

The NOP explained its thinking about the final Guidance by also publishing its responses to comments submitted to them regarding the draft Guidance. One of the most important sections states: "Several commenters pointed out that this guidance needs to be very clear about NOP’s expectations for producers to implement conservation practices above those that are required by the other sections of the standards, notably §205.203(b), requiring crop rotations, cover crops, and the application of plant and animal materials, and §205.203(c), requiring producers to maintain or improve soil organic matter content without causing contamination of crops, soil or water. Some comments suggested the guidance should clarify that in order to maintain or improve all the natural resources as defined under §205.2, including soil, water, wetlands, woodlands, and wildlife, and conserve biodiversity, a comprehensive approach to natural resource management is necessary and goes beyond maintaining soil or water quality. In response, we updated this section of the guidance to include reference to § 205.2, the definition of Natural Resources of the Operation. Certified operations are required to implement measures that support natural resource conservation and biodiversity in addition to maintaining soil or water quality."  

Click here to understand the NOP's thinking on the Guidance by reading their Responses to Comments.

Click here to read WFA's summary analysis of the final Guidance.

The NOP also updated their Organic System Plan for crops, with NCAT's help, to be streamlined. See pages 4-5 for the Natural Resources of the Operation and Biodiversity Conservation Management section. Read the new plan here: NOP Streamlined OSP for Crop Production.

WFA publishes How to Conserve Biodiversity on the Farm: Actions to Take on a Continuum from Simple to Complexa publication for all farmers and for certifiers.

WFA publishes Biodiversity Conservation: An Organic Farmer’s and Certifier’s Guide.


After many years of hard work, WFA had another success. In 2015, the NOP released a draft of the Natural Resources Conservation Guidance. While we were happy it was out, we submitted suggested improvements.

Click here to see the NOP's Draft of the Natural Resources Conservation Guidance. 

Click here to read the WFA's summary of recommendations, and the Actual comments WFA and partners submitted a to further strengthen this draft. 


Wild Farm Alliance and International Organic Inspectors Association (IOIA) collaborated on surveys and interviews of over 50 inspectors and certification reviewers, as part of a joint project to integrate biodiversity and natural resources conservation as a fundamental principle in organic inspections.

According to those who responded, an average of only about 60% of organic farmers understand biodiversity conservation as part of compliance for their certification. While 79% of those who responded said biodiversity conservation is integrated into the organic inspection and/or certification review process, only 55% integrate it as foundational principle of organic agriculture. All respondents reported a basic understanding of biodiversity conservation, and 40% of those rated themselves as having a deep understanding. 94% would like more about non-compliances and how NRCS and other conservation programs work.

Read more about the Surveys and interviews of over 50 inspectors and certification reviewers


Another breakthrough--The NOP includes the natural resources §205.200 in several of their Accreditation Checklists they use to accredit organic certifiers. Many organic certifiers who were denying this was in the regulations have now changed their stance to supporting it!

WFA and partners submitted a summary cover letter and Draft Biodiversity Conservation Guidance for consideration of the National Organic Program (NOP) to adopt into their Handbook.

Read WFA's Summary Cover Letter.

Read WFA's Draft Biodiversity Conservation Guidance



In order to help organic farmers include biodiversity into their Organic System Plans and to assist certifiers in addressing verification, we created a compliance assessment document. A quick one-page overview examines the most problematic biodiversity issues, while the rest of the document provides a slate of beneficial practices that comply with the rule. 

Download WFA's Biodiversity Compliance Assessment in Organic Agricultural Systems.



The ice starts melting this year. Once the NOSB saw WFA's above compliance document, they took a fervent stance recommending that the National Organic Program (NOP) comprehensively address biodiversity conservation, from farmers and certifiers to the NOP itself.

Read the NOSB Comprehensive Biodiversity Recommendation to the NOP.




WFA brings attention to the organic world that biodiversity conservation is part of the National Organic Program (NOP) regulations. We began by working with a broad base of organic experts across the country to create a set of biodiversity inspection questions that the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) then adopted into their model farm plan.

We also published Biodiversity Conservation guides for organic farmers and certifiers. The guides lay out a range of farm management possibilities for a variety of situations that maintain and enhance biodiversity at the farm level and contribute to biodiversity conservation outside of farm borders at the regional or watershed level. 

Learn more about the first biodiversity conservation additions into the NOSB's Organic System Plan Template.

Download WFA's Biodiversity Conservation Guides.


history.jpegWhat's next?

We are pleased to see the progress of the organic regulations protecting biodiversity; however, there is more to do. Here are the top issues we are continuing to work on:

  • Provide more training for the certifiers and their inspectors.
  • Support the full development and implementation of biodiversity conservation in the Organic System Plan (OSP) by organic farmers, ranchers, wild crop harvesters, and handlers.
  • Work with US based certifiers to update their OSPs to incorporate more biodiversity conservation questions.
  • Eliminate the incentive to convert unplowed native habitat to organic crop production due to the three-year waiting period for land which has had pesticides applied. Read More